Doug Lane

SQL Server Entertainer

  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Blog
  • About Doug

The MCM Is Dead, But The Idea Doesn’t Have To Be

August 31, 2013 by Doug Lane

Microsoft has announced it’s discontinuing the MCM (Microsoft Certified Master) certification on October 1, 2013. Anyone who has passed the knowledge exam has roughly thirty days to pass the lab exam, otherwise they can never become an MCM and whatever work they’ve put into earning MCM will be lost. As you can imagine, this is not going over well in the SQL Server community, especially among those who have put in hundreds of hours toward passing the MCM exams. (If I were halfway there — having passed the knowledge exam –I’d be pissed.) Assuming Microsoft doesn’t reverse their decision, a lot of SQL people will be denied the opportunity to be certified in a way that really matters; a crowd of colonels without a general’s star to earn.

There’s a Connect item petitioning Microsoft to keep the program alive. I hope it succeeds (I voted for it). Keeping the program at Microsoft would be the best-case scenario. But what if it doesn’t succeed and the MCM is truly discontinued?

Maybe this is an opportunity in disguise.

This is a void PASS could fill.

Behold the PCM: PASS Certified Master

I’ve only been on the SQL Server scene a few years. I don’t know the history or the mission of PASS well enough to say how feasible this is. Also, I’ve never taken an MCM exam, so only know in vague terms what’s in them. That stated, here’s why — again, assuming Microsoft really does stop the MCM program — I think this is a great opportunity for PASS.

It’s a powerful community service for PASS

I’ve often heard the question, “What are the benefits of joining PASS? What do I get as a member?” This could be a high-profile service of PASS, and a chance to improve credibility and visibility, even more so if they offer a BI version.

PCM Exams written by your peers…

The PCM exams would be written by the most knowledgable and experienced PASS members who implement and manage SQL Server day-to-day.

…who happen to be MCMs

There are enough MCMs in PASS that they could recruit some to help [re-]create the exams and ensure a comparable level of quality and integrity to the existing MCM exams.

We’re talking one certification, not the entire certification program

PASS hasn’t the resources to run an entire certification program, but it may be able to take on one cert. (At least to start with. I’d love to see a PCM-BI too.) Leave the lower levels to Microsoft and make the MCSE a prerequisite.

Administering the exams on request could be too much work. Instead, offer it only at the PASS Summit and one or two other times throughout the year.

I know, it’s not that simple.

I can think of numerous reasons why this wouldn’t work (cost to implement, not enough PASS volunteers, cost of advertising, exceeding PASS’ mission) but at the risk of appearing stupidly optimistic, I believe it can be done. Although I’m not an MCM (not even close), I’d volunteer to help make this happen.

So tell me, why not look at this as a baby shower instead of a funeral? Leave your take in the comments below.

 

Filed Under: Certification

MCTS 70-448: Failure is a Fine Option

July 1, 2011 by Doug Lane

This was the second time I failed a certification exam, and the first time I expected to fail. It’s also the first time I’ve been perfectly content with failing.

I took the MCTS 70-448 – Business Intelligence exam yesterday morning only because I had to. I signed up for the three-exam pack offered by Microsoft and Prometric on June 22, and as a requirement I had to sit for an exam before July 1. Having only eight days to study, I put my odds of passing around fifty-fifty. I knew I’d do well at Integration Services, I’d do very well at Reporting Services, and I’d need to remember everything I’d crammed in the last three days in order to salvage the Analysis Services section.

That’s pretty much how it went.

70-448 Exam Breakdown, Doug Lane, June 2011
What almost passing looks like

While the pass/fail result met my expectations, I was surprised to learn from the test that:

  • I know more than I thought I knew about deploying Integration Services.
  • I know less than I thought I knew about developing Reporting Services.
  • Apparently, I am as proficient at deploying SSAS solutions as I am developing an SSRS solution. (Riiiiiiiiiight.)

But most importantly:

  • With a score of 610, I was dangerously close to passing (700), and I will absolutely pass this exam on my second try.

I was happy about failing for two reasons. First, I didn’t crash and burn in any one category and my overall score tells me I’m on solid ground with this material. Second, I often hear that certifications (especially the lower-level Microsoft ones) are “not worth the paper they’re printed on.” Had I passed today, armed with little book knowledge and virtually no real-world experience of Analysis Services, I would have done the certification a disservice. I didn’t deserve it this time.

Fortunately, I have two things working in my favor for re-taking the exam. First, I have a free second shot (part of the exam pack offer), which I hope to take in the next 30 days, while the material is still fresh in my head. Second, I just started prototyping an Analysis Services solution — my first ever — at work. My boss is very enthused about the potential for this project, so I can allocate plenty of time to it right away. With a little hands-on experience and more study time, I’m going to do just fine on the re-take.

In my eleven-year history of certification exams, I’m now 8-for-10. That’s okay. Failing the 70-448 this time just feels right.

Filed Under: Analysis Services, Career, Certification, Integration Services, Reporting Services

Subscribe now!

Don't miss new posts as they publish. Enter your e-mail address to subscribe!

Your e-mail address will stay quietly between us, like that time I set the carpet on fire by accident.

Copyright © 2025 · Outreach Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in